Full Site View
HOTTEST SHEETS!
Quick Links
  Home
  My Bulletin
  Contact The Bulletin
Opinion

Mail: Southern statues symbolize suppession

Mail: Thanks for helping Aiden

More opinion

Ag News

Fall: Good time to spray musk thistle in rosette stage

Robertson and Delsing re-elected chair, vice chair of NWB

More Ag News

NorthPlatte Weather


Email Article | Print Article
Opinion - Opinion
 
Groene at the Legislature: Committee hearings on TIFTell North Platte what you think
 
Courtesy Photo­Image
Mike Groene

(As legislative hearings are being held about tax increment financing. Sen. Mike Groene writes about his perspective on TIF. - Editor):

In November 1978, Nebraskans adopted Amendment 1, which added Article VIII, Section 12 to our state Constitution. The amendment created an exception to the constitutional mandate that property taxes are levied “uniformly and proportionately upon all real property."

Nationally, an idea had emerged to encourage urban renewal, to aid our country's inner cities. Voters allowed municipalities to unilaterally confiscate from all local government entities the increased increment of property taxes attributed to new construction for the purpose of "rehabilitating, acquiring, or redeveloping substandard and blighted property in a redevelopment project."

This created what's known as Tax Increment Financing (TIF).

The voters understood the amendment. An Aug. 6, 1978, Omaha World-Herald article stated, the proposal was "to encourage developers to use downtown or main street property instead of building on the outskirts of town, where taxes and property values may be lower."

The following year the Legislature enacted legislation with an understanding that TIF’s purpose was to fund urban renewal. They knew that existing redevelopment law defined "substandard" as conditions where “there is a predominance of buildings" marked by "dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provisions for ventilation" or "conditions which endanger life or property by fire" or are "conductive to ill health."

Blighted property was defined in terms such as "unsanitary or unsafe conditions," and open land was defined as "unimproved land that has been in the city for 40 years and has remained unimproved during that time.”

Lawmakers understood that TIF was not a description of a redevelopment area but instead was a financing tool for individual projects that fit certain criteria. Amendment 1 made an important distinction when it used the conjunction “and”: requiring that the property be both "substandard and blighted."

This provision was unlike older redevelopment laws, which allowed a project to be approved if either condition exists.

You get the point; we are not describing a farm field.

Last year, TIF diverted $70 million from local government coffers statewide.  TIF has a negative effect on public school funding and adds to already high property tax burdens. Normal growth from housing and retail development brings the need for increased public services, but TIF’s tax revenue shift to developers causes existing taxpayers to foot the bill.

How did a good program that helped rejuvenate the riverfront in Omaha and the entrance to the old downtown in North Platte evolve into something now used as an economic development giveaway or threat —“give it to me or I won’t build”— for normal free market projects such as building homes on a newly annexed farm field, a chicken factory outside of town, or a big-box store on prime real-estate near an interstate-highway?

The answer is simple: When the Legislature enacted legislation defining TIF, they never allowed for state oversight. Imagine a speed limit without police, and you understand TIF use in Nebraska.

TIF today is whatever a city council wants it to be. Attorneys create tailored legal arguments that promote opportunistic, “end justifies the means” interpretations of TIF. Other than filing expensive civil lawsuits, local taxing entities and citizens have no recourse to stop such practices.

The most obvious way to stop this abuse is to elect city officials who have an appreciation of the rule of law. In lieu of that, I have and will continue to introduce legislation to put state oversight into TIF; our first attempts have been killed in committee.

Why, you ask, would elected city and state officials oppose legislation that promotes accountability and transparency in government? The answer is always the same — follow the money!


Contact us at: mgroene@leg.ne.gov or 402-471-2729.

 

(The Bulletin's Aug. 30 print edition contains the report of a TIF hearing in North Platte, held by the Legislature's urban affairs committee.)


Like this story to send to your facebook

The North Platte Bulletin - Published 8/29/2017
Copyright © 2017 northplattebulletin.com - All rights reserved.
Flatrock Publishing, Inc. - 1300 E 4th St., Suite F - North Platte, NE 69101
 
Hide Talk Back
 

Talk Back
 
Thanks Mike.
-25
Posted by Chuck Matson    - 8/30/2017 8:06:21 AM
(0 current warning - 1 warnings total)

FLAG LEGEND:
Green Flag = No current warnings. Any past warnings have expired.
Yellow Flag = Minor offense. Post was edited where neccessary. Yellow flags fly for 7 days.
Red Flag = A more serious offense. This user can't post to Talk Back for 7 days. The offending post has been permanently blacked out. Red flags fly for 7 days.
Black Flag = The most serious offense. This flag is reserved for those with multiple or particularly agregious offenses. Last step before permanent banishment. Black flags fly for 30 days.
Skull & Crossbones = Banned.
 
 
Login to post Talk Back
Close


Click on the cop Report Talk Back Abuse to report Talk Back abuse and misuse
 
 
 
|
111001011100